Skip to main content

About



I am a lawyer and academician specialising in intellectual property law, trade, and international investment law and policy. Currently, I am a Lecturer (Assistant Professor) of Intellectual Property Law at the School of Law, Queen's University Belfast, UK.  Before moving to academia, I practiced law and  appeared before the Supreme Court of Nepal and sub-ordinate courts; have taught in Nepal and continue to advise and write on legal and policy issues related to Nepal.

 My research focuses on the Transatlantic and the Global South. I have experience working in the Philippines, India, Thailand, and Nepal on different intellectual property, trade, and investment-related issues. In the past, I was a visiting research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition in Munich, Germany, and the Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management (CIPPM) of Bournemouth University in the UK. I have represented and worked as a consultant for international organizations, companies, EU funded projects. 

 I have taught intellectual property, trade and investment law at the Europe-North America and the Europe-Asia Programme of Sciences Po. In 2021, I was a adjunct Professor  at Sciences Po (Middle East and Mediterranean Campus), and currently a  Research Affiliate at Sciences Po Law School and Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki and also a  Transatlantic Technology Law  (TTLF) Fellow at Stanford Law School (USA).

I hold Ph.D. in Law from Sciences Po Law School Paris, LLM from Maastricht University, Netherlands as a UM High Potential Scholar and BSc.LLB (Hons) degree from KIIT University, India, and also a fellow of the Global Policy Forum for Nepal (UK) and has advised the Government of Nepal on intellectual property and investment issues. 

I serve as a member of the Editorial Board for the Global Trade & Customs Journal, Kluwer Law International.

I can be reached by upretipratyush@gmail.com/pratyush.upreti@sciencespo.fr
A detailed CV is available on request.

Linkedin Profile
Twitter Account

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual Property Rights in Nepal

Pratyush Nath Upreti Speaking at a memorial service for Nelson Mandela on Dec 10, 2013, South African President Jacob Zuma said, “There is no one like Madiba. He was one of a kind.” Indeed the South African president’s statement about the world’s greatest liberator who contributed so much to strengthening the values of human rights is very significant. Mandela is an inspiration for all mankind. Unfortunately, a controversy has arisen over the ownership and unauthorised use of the name Mandela since his death. Nelson Mandela’s image, name and quotations have been registered under the proprietorship of the Nelson Mandela Foundation as per South African trademark laws. They are registered under several classes including jewellery, clothing, books and other products. Furthermore, other proprietors of the Mandela brand include the Nelson Mandela Children’s Hospital Trust, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University and the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund. Infringement and unauthorised use of

IP License as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v.Panama

IP License as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v.Panama Please find full article here: ABSTRACT The relationship between intellectual property (IP)and investment is old, but the debates are new. Recent high profile cases in which intellectual property rights(IPRs) are being sought to be protected by means of international investment law and treaties have generated visible debate and discussion. In the light of the recent decision on expedited objections in Bridgestone Licensing v. Republic of Panama, this article will explore arguments put forwarded by both parties regarding the interaction between IP Licence Agreements and the definition of investment, as well as the Tribunal’s finding on the question whether an IP Licence with a revenue sharing model qualifies as an investment. Citation: Pratyush Nath Upreti, IP License as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v.Panama (2018)1(1) Stockholm Intellectual Property Review 16 full text of the article is available h
At The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) of European Union, Alicante, Spain, 2015

Philip Morris v Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation

Citation: Pratyush Nath Upreti, Philip Morris v Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation, European Intellectual Property Review (2018)40(4), 277­